Skip to content

V0.4.0/rtm #9

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 13, 2024
Merged

V0.4.0/rtm #9

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 13, 2024

Conversation

gimlichael
Copy link
Member

@gimlichael gimlichael commented Nov 13, 2024

This pull request includes updates to the documentation, package versions, and test environment configurations. The most important changes are grouped by their themes: documentation updates, package version updates, and test environment updates.

Documentation Updates:

  • Updated the availability information to include .NET 9 and .NET 8 in .docfx/includes/availability-modern.md.

Package Version Updates:

  • Updated various package versions from release candidates to stable versions in Directory.Packages.props.

Test Environment Updates:

  • Updated the Docker image for the Docker-Ubuntu test environment in testenvironments.json to use a newer version.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated availability information for .NET 9 and .NET 8 in documentation.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated package dependencies to stable versions, improving reliability.
  • Chores

    • Updated Docker image version in the testing environment for better compatibility.

@gimlichael gimlichael self-assigned this Nov 13, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 13, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces updates across three files. The .docfx/includes/availability-modern.md file now specifies the availability of the subject matter for both .NET 8 and .NET 9. The Directory.Packages.props file has been modified to reflect stable versions of several package dependencies, replacing their previous release candidate versions. Additionally, the testenvironments.json file has had its Docker image version updated for the "Docker-Ubuntu" environment, ensuring compatibility with the latest testing requirements.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.docfx/includes/availability-modern.md Added availability information: Availability: .NET 9 and .NET 8
Directory.Packages.props Updated package versions from release candidates to stable versions for several packages: Cuemon.Extensions.IO, Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.App, Savvyio.Domain, Savvyio.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Json, Savvyio.Extensions.Text.Json
testenvironments.json Updated dockerImage for "Docker-Ubuntu" from gimlichael/ubuntu-testrunner:net6.0.427-net8.0.403-9.0.100-rc.2.24474.11 to gimlichael/ubuntu-testrunner:net8.0.404-9.0.100

Possibly related PRs

  • V0.3.0/alm #7: The main PR updates the availability information for .NET versions in a documentation file, while the retrieved PR also involves updates related to versioning and dependencies, indicating a potential connection in terms of maintaining compatibility across .NET versions.

🐇 In the garden where changes bloom,
.NET versions now have room.
Packages stable, no more "rc,"
Docker images fresh, oh so free!
With clarity in docs, we hop with glee,
A leap for all, come join the spree! 🌼

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@gimlichael has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 1 minutes and 16 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4e1315d and a83ed28.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4e1315d and a83ed28.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .docfx/includes/availability-modern.md (1 hunks)
  • Directory.Packages.props (1 hunks)
  • testenvironments.json (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • .docfx/includes/availability-modern.md
  • testenvironments.json
🔇 Additional comments (3)
Directory.Packages.props (3)

Line range hint 1-20: LGTM! Well-structured package version management

The approach of:

  1. Using centralized package version management
  2. Keeping test packages stable while upgrading RC versions
  3. Synchronizing related package versions (e.g., all Savvyio packages to 4.0.0)

is well-thought-out and follows good practices.


11-13: Verify compatibility across Savvyio packages

The synchronized update of all Savvyio packages from 4.0.0-rc.1 to 4.0.0 looks good. Let's verify these versions.

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check NuGet for latest Savvyio package versions and verify synchronized versioning

# Check latest versions for all Savvyio packages
for package in "Savvyio.Domain" "Savvyio.Extensions.Newtonsoft.Json" "Savvyio.Extensions.Text.Json"; do
    echo "Checking $package..."
    curl -s "https://api.nuget.org/v3-flatcontainer/$package/index.json" | jq -r '.versions[]' | tail -n 5
done

# Look for breaking changes or migration guides
echo "Searching for breaking changes..."
rg -i "breaking.*changes?|migration|upgrade" -g "CHANGELOG.md" -g "RELEASE*.md"

6-7: Verify compatibility between Cuemon and Codebelt packages

The update from RC to stable versions is a good practice. However, let's verify the compatibility and latest versions.

✅ Verification successful

Package version updates appear safe to proceed

The packages are actively used in test files for serialization and testing purposes. The update from RC to stable version 9.0.0 is reasonable given:

  • Both packages are consistently used together in test files
  • The packages are referenced in the test project without specific version constraints
  • The usage patterns in test files suggest standard IO and testing functionality that's unlikely to have breaking changes between RC and stable
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check NuGet for latest versions and potential compatibility issues

# Check latest versions
for package in "Cuemon.Extensions.IO" "Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.App"; do
    echo "Checking $package..."
    curl -s "https://api.nuget.org/v3-flatcontainer/$package/index.json" | jq -r '.versions[]' | tail -n 5
done

# Look for breaking changes in release notes or changelog
for package in "Cuemon.Extensions.IO" "Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.App"; do
    echo "Searching for breaking changes in $package..."
    rg -i "breaking.*changes?|migration|upgrade" -g "CHANGELOG.md" -g "RELEASE*.md"
done

Length of output: 1511


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the package versions and their usage

# First, let's find all .csproj files that might reference these packages
echo "Finding .csproj files that reference these packages..."
rg -l "Cuemon.Extensions.IO|Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.App" -g "*.csproj"

# Then look for any test files or configurations that might show dependencies
echo "Looking for test configurations..."
rg -l "Cuemon.Extensions.IO|Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit.App" -g "*.cs" -g "*.config"

# Check for any migration guides or breaking changes documentation
echo "Checking for migration or breaking changes documentation..."
fd -g "README.md" -g "CHANGELOG.md" -g "BREAKING*.md" -g "MIGRATION*.md" -X cat {}

Length of output: 1237


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the actual usage in the test files to understand the dependency requirements

# Check the content of the test project file
echo "Examining test project file:"
cat "test/Codebelt.SharedKernel.Tests/Codebelt.SharedKernel.Tests.csproj"

# Check how these packages are used in test files
echo -e "\nExamining test file usages:"
for file in test/Codebelt.SharedKernel.Tests/TimeToLiveTest.cs \
            test/Codebelt.SharedKernel.Tests/ClockSkewTest.cs \
            test/Codebelt.SharedKernel.Tests/TokenTest.cs; do
    echo -e "\nFile: $file"
    echo "----------------------------------------"
    cat "$file" | grep -A 5 -B 5 "Cuemon\|Codebelt.Extensions.Xunit"
done

Length of output: 2763


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 13, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.50%. Comparing base (4e1315d) to head (a83ed28).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main       #9   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.50%   88.50%           
=======================================
  Files          11       11           
  Lines         200      200           
  Branches        8        8           
=======================================
  Hits          177      177           
  Misses         23       23           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@gimlichael gimlichael merged commit c09d767 into main Nov 13, 2024
19 checks passed
@gimlichael gimlichael deleted the v0.4.0/rtm branch November 13, 2024 07:28
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 31, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant